RAMAVTAR S/O NATTHU v. MAHENDRA KABUTRA S/O LAKHAN
CFA/1178/2024 · 2026-08-11
Maneesh Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12819 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12819 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:31593] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 1178/2024 CNR: RJHC020885832024 | URN: CFA / 1786U / 2024 Ramavtar S/o Natthu, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Village Chawla Ka Bas, Ghegholi, P.S. M.I.A. Distt. Alwar (Raj.). ----Appellant Versus 1 Mahendra Kabutra S/o Lakhan, R/o Datar Nagar, Parai, Tehsil And Distt, Jhansi (U.P.). 2 Smt. Saroj W/o Mahendra Kabutra, R/o Datar Nagar, Parai, Tehsil And Distt. Jhansi (U.P.). 3 Mamraj S/o Shri Sohanlal, R/o Chawla Ka Bas, Village Ghegholi, P.S. M.I.A. Alwar (Raj.). 4 Siyaram S/o Shri Kantha, R/o Village Niham Buddi Ke Bas, Thana Sikri, Distt. Bharatpur Now Deeg (Raj.). 5 Tarachand S/o Shri Siyaram, R/o Village Niham Buddi Ka Bas, Thana Sikri, Distt. Bharatpur Now Deeg (Raj.). 6 Balveer S/o Shri Rattiram, R/o Village Niham Buddi Ke Bas, Thana Sikri, Distt. Bharatpur Now Deeg (Raj.). 7 Shripat S/o Tikaram, R/o Jogi Mohalla, Bhanokhar Road, Kathumar, Distt. Alwar (Raj.). 8 Suneri S/o Gangasahay, R/o Jogi Mohalla, Bhanokhar Road, Kathumar, Distt. Alwar (Raj.). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 11/08/2026
1. The present civil first appeal has been filed by the appellant on 10.10.2024, assailing the judgment and decree dated 23.07.2024 passed by learned District Judge, Alwar, in Civil Suit
[2026:RJ-JP:31593] (2 of 2) [CFA-1178/2024] No.126/2024 (44/2017) (72/2022) titled as 'Ramavtar Vs. Mahendra Kabutra & Ors.' whereby the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for compensation of Rs.5,10,000/- was dismissed.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant.
3. From a bare perusal of the record, it is reflected from the date of filing the present appeal, i.e. 10.10.2024, till now, the defects pointed out by the office have not been removed.
4. Thus, from the foregoing discussion, it is evident that the appellant herein has lost interest in pursuing the present matter.
5. In view of the above, the present civil first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
6. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J 151/Seema