Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23821 WP No. 14952 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 14952 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
CANARA BANK SPECIALIZED ARM BRANCH MANIPAL SRD BUILDING, NEAR HEAD OFFICE ANNEXE, MANIPAL, UDUPI-576104 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER SRI C S V L NARASIMHA SARMA …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T.P..MUTHANNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, ROOM NO.627, 6TH FLOOR, GATE-1, MS BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR M/S.GOLD JEWELLERS DOOR NO.43/B, NANDIKESHWARA TOWERS/ENTERPRISES, NEAR PARIJATHA CIRCLE, KUNDAPURA-576201. 3. SUB REGISTRAR BRAHMAVARA S R O, UDUPI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA-576101. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23821 WP No. 14952 of 2025
4. UNDERSECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL CELL) VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 5. SRI.GANESH SHETTY S/O. LATE GOPAL SHETTY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS PROP. HEGDE FARMS SHREE LAKSHMI, HOUSE NO.391-II, PURNIK ROAD, KOTESHWARA, KUNDAPURA-576222. 6. SMT. BHAGYALAXMI SHETTY W/O.GANESH SHETTY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS SHREE LAKSHMI, HOUSE NO.391-11, PURNIK ROAD, KOTESHWARA, KUNDAPURA-576222. 7. MR. SANDEEP M SHETTY C/O.MANDARA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS B-702 PRIDE ENCHANTA NO.320, MYSORE ROAD, OPPOSITE BHEL, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU-560026. 8. MR. RAJESH KOZHITHODIYIL S/O. V.P.GOVINDAN KUTTY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NO.103, SUNDER MANOR, NO.23 MAIN, KAVALBYRASANDRA, NP FACTORY ROAD, BENGALURU NORTH, RT NAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. 9. MR.JITENDRA KUMAR JENA S/O.SUKANT KUMAR JENA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS FLAT NO.407, HI-VISION SERENE, HANS AVE ROAD, KHUSAIGUDA,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23821 WP No. 14952 of 2025
KAPRA, ECIL, MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI, TELANGANA-500062. 10. MR.JITENDRA NAYAK C/O. BIDYADHAR NAYAK AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS FLAT NO.301, 3RD FLOOR, SR ARCADE, PLOT NO.14, 15, SURVEY NO.55,65,66, SURYA NAGAR, MALKAJIGIRI, NEAR MAISAMMA TEMPLE, NEREDMET, MALKAJGIRI, TELANGANA-500056. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1, R3 AND R4;
SRI. VEERESH BUDHIHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI.
PRASANNA K SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R7 TO R10;
NOTICE TO R5 AND R6 ARE DISPENSED WITH VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 23.09.2025)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS OF ATTACHMENT/SEIZURE DATED 05.09.2024 AND 25.09.2024 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE XCI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE FOR KPIDFE CASES, BENGALURU UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SUB- SECTION (2) OF SECTION (3) OF THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, 2004 (KPIDFE) IN MISC. PETITION NOS. 130/2024 AND 133/2024 IN SO FAR THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED (ANNEXURE-D AND E) AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23821 WP No. 14952 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
"PRAYER WHEREFORE the Petitioner prays that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to: a) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction to set aside the orders of attachment/seizure dated 05.09.2024 & 25.09.2024 passed by the Hon'ble XCI Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge for KPIDFE Cases, Bengaluru under the provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section (3) of the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004 (KPIDFE) in Misc.Petition Nos.130/2024 & 133/2024 in so far the schedule property is concerned. (Annexure - D & E) b) Issue a direction/mandamus to Respondent No.4 to release the Schedule Property mortgaged to the Petitioner as per Annexure-B to enable the Petitioner to sell the property to realize its dues. c) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction on the Respondent No.3 to register the sale certificate dated 20.02.2025 issued by the Petitioner in favour of Respondent Nos.7 to 10. (Annexure - C) d) Grant any other order or direction as may deem fit in the circumstances of the case."
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/Bank submits that the Special Court was not right in passing the
order where the properties are attached much prior to the
order passed by the Apex Court. He also relied on the judgment of the Bombay High Court in case of ASREC (India) Limited
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23821 WP No. 14952 of 2025
Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others1. Relying on this
judgment, it is submitted that the order passed by the Special Court is contrary to law and the same needs to be set aside.
3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that when an order is passed under Section 5(2) of the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as KPIDFE Act) a miscellaneous first appeal has to be filed before the High Court and a writ petition is not maintainable.
4. In response to that, learned counsel for the petitioner/Bank submits that they have a case on merits and the order has to be set aside.
5. Having heard the learned counsels on either side, perused the entire material on record. The petitioner is questioning an order passed by the Special Court under Section 5(2) of the KPIDFE Act. Even if there is an illegality or the petitioner has a good case on merits, still the petitioner cannot bypass the remedy that is available under Section 16 of the
1 2026 SCC OnLine Bom 2067
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23821 WP No. 14952 of 2025
KPIDFE Act where the miscellaneous first appeal has to be filed before the High Court. In that view of the matter, this Court is passing the following order:
ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy as per Section 16 of the KPIDFE Act. ii. The petitioner shall have the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. iii. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62