Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12816 (MAD)

Sathish v. The State represented, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/9923/2026 · 2026-04-21

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 9923 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 9923 of 2026 Sathish S/o.Velusamy, No.277/1, Vennankurichi, Irumpulikurichi, Sendurain Taluk, Ariyalur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented, The Inspector of Police, Kunnam Police Station, Perambalur District (Crime No. 6 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 6 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Rajasekar For Respondent(s): MR.P.DHILEEPAN, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 24(1) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act 2003 & 77 of the Juvenile Justice Act 2015 in Crime No.6 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9923 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 178 kgs of banned tobacco products. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this is the fourth anticipatory bail application. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are no previous cases against the petitioner and that this is the fourth anticipatory bail application. It is further submitted that the earlier anticipatory bail applications were dismissed and that there is no change in circumstances in the present application. 4. Considering the gravity of the offences and upon the ground that there is no change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. 21-04-2026 DRL https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9923 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1.The Inspector of Police, Kunnam Police Station, Perambalur District (Crime No. 6 of 2026) 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9923 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 9923 of 2026 21-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis