Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12815 (GAU)

ARIFUL HUSSAIN v. MUSSTT. LAILY BEGUM AND 2 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/1332/2026 · 2026-08-11

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010066772026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1332/2026 ARIFUL HUSSAIN S/O ABU HUSSAIN, R/O VILL- FALIMARI, P.S.- GAURIPUR, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS MUSSTT. LAILY BEGUM AND 2 ORS. D/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM, R/O VILL- KARAITARI, P.S.- FAKIRAGRAM, DIST- KOKRAJHAR, BTR (ASSAM) 2:FATEMA BEWA W/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM R/O VILL- KARAITARI P.S.- FAKIRAGRAM DIST- KOKRAJHAR BTR (ASSAM) 3:FARUK ISLAM S/O LATE NAZRUL ISLAM R/O VILL- KARAITARI P.S.- FAKIRAGRAM DIST- KOKRAJHAR BTR (ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R BARUAH, MS. J SARMA,G IMTIAZ,MR. A IKBAL Advocate for the Respondent : MR. I A TALUKDAR(R1,2,3), Page No.# 2/2 Linked Case : ITREF(A)/0/0 ARIFUL HUSSAIN ASSAM VERSUS MUSSTT LAILY BEGUM ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR RATUL BARUAH Advocate for : appearing for MUSSTT LAILY BEGUM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 12.08.2026 Heard Mr. G. Imtiaz, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. I A Talukdar, learned counsel representing the respondents. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 106 days in preferring the connected RSA. Mr. Talukdar has filed objection. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides. This Court is of the opinion that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. Then present interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant