Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12803 (JHR)

AMBAR KUMAR RAM ALLIAS AMBER KUMAR RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3482/2026 · 2026-05-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15156 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3482 of 2026 Ambar Kumar Ram @ Amber Kumar Ram, son of Babla Ram, aged about 21 years, r/o Devi Mandap, Bazar Tand, PO Kokar, PS Sadar, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. ... … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … ... Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY --------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Bhanu Kumar No.1, Advocate For the State :Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P. --------- 03/Dated: 14.05.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 632/2025 (N) instituted under Sections 21 (b) and 22 (b)/23/25 of N.D.P.S Act and 111 (2) (b) B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of the 41.20 gram of Brown sugar also known as heroin which was recovered from petitioner and in total 81.2 gram of brown sugar was recovered from the co-accused including the petitioner. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the seized brown sugar come under intermediate quantity. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 31.12.2025, as mentioned in para 9 of this bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused persons with similar allegation have already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 27.4.2026 in B.A. No. 3483 of 2026 and vide order dated 09.04.2026 in BA No.2900 of 2026. Hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner-Cum-Special Judge (NDPS), Ranchi in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 632/25 (N) with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 14.05.2026 Uploaded: 16.5.2026 KNR