Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1280 (AP)

Charukuri Ravindranath v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/459/2026 · 2026-04-26

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010224622026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION Between: 1. CHARUKURI RAVINDRANATH, S/O.BADRAIAH, AGE 50 YEARS,R/O.PIOT NO.401, SAI SRI RESIDENCE, MANGAMOOR ROAD,ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF 2. GOGINENI SASHAMMA, W/O.VENKAIAH,AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.KATUKURIVARI PALEM VILLAGE,TANGUTUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in t CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased tothe above named Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case before this Hon'ble Court aggrieved by the order dated 17 Crl.M.P.No.767 of 2026 in C.C.No.l773 of 2025, on the file of Judicial Magistrate of I-Class, Singarayakonda, wherein the Id. Magistrate dismissed the petition filed under section 243 of Cr.P.C for seeking expert opinion promissory note and cheque. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 459/2026 CHARUKURI RAVINDRANATH, S/O.BADRAIAH, AGE 50 YEARS,R/O.PIOT NO.401, SAI SRI RESIDENCE, MANGAMOOR ROAD,ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATHI, GOGINENI SASHAMMA, W/O.VENKAIAH,AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.KATUKURIVARI PALEM VILLAGE,TANGUTUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased tothe above named Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case before this Hon'ble Court aggrieved by the order dated 17-03-2026, passed in rl.M.P.No.767 of 2026 in C.C.No.l773 of 2025, on the file of Judicial Class, Singarayakonda, wherein the Id. Magistrate dismissed the petition filed under section 243 of Cr.P.C for seeking expert opinion promissory note and cheque. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CHARUKURI RAVINDRANATH, S/O.BADRAIAH, AGE 50 YEARS,R/O.PIOT NO.401, SAI SRI RESIDENCE, MANGAMOOR ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC GOGINENI SASHAMMA, W/O.VENKAIAH,AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.KATUKURIVARI PALEM VILLAGE,TANGUTUR MANDAL, ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the he affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased tothe above named Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case 2026, passed in rl.M.P.No.767 of 2026 in C.C.No.l773 of 2025, on the file of Judicial Class, Singarayakonda, wherein the Id. Magistrate dismissed the petition filed under section 243 of Cr.P.C for seeking expert opinion Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 459/2026 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed challenging the order dated 17-03- 2026, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of I-Class, Singarayakonda in Crl.M.P.No.767 of 2026 in C.C.No.l773 of 2025. 2. Heard Sri T.Lakshmi Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that revision would not lie against this Order, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. 5. Recording the same, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. However, petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.04.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 25 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 459/2026 Dt.27.04.2026 KKV