Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12799 (GAU)

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SHAHIDUL ISLAM AND ANR.

I.A.(Civil)/2858/2026 · 2026-08-23

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010136822026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2858/2026 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI, G.S. ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER,GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI 781007 VERSUS SHAHIDUL ISLAM AND ANR. S/O KASIM ALI, R/O. VILLAGE - BHERALDI, P. O. - BHELLA, P.S. - BARPETA, DISTRICT - BARPETA, ASSAM. PIN -781309 2:SADDAM JAMADAR S/O SIDDIQUE JAMADAR R/O. VILLAGE - GALIA P.O. - GALIA P.S. - HOWLY DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM. PIN -78135 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P SHARMA, MS. C MOZUMDAR,MS. R D MOZUMDAR Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : MACApp./0/0 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI G.S. ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAT MANAGER GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE ULUBARI GUWAHATI 781007 VERSUS SHAHIDUL ISLAM S/O KASIM ALI R/O. VILLAGE - BHERALDI P. O. - BHELIA P.S. - BARPETA DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM. PIN -781309 2:SADDAM JAMADAR OWNER S/O SIDDIQUE JAMADAR R/O. VILLAGE - GALIA P.O. - GALIA P.S. - HOWLY DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM. PIN -781352 ------------ Advocate for : Samujjal Pratim Sharma Advocate for : appearing for SHAHIDUL ISLAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 24.08.2026 Heard Ms. R D Mozumdar, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 82 days in preferring the connected appeal. Page No.# 3/3 The delay has been satisfactorily explained. This Court is of the opinion that going for issuing notice to the respondent would be nothing but sheer waste of time. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list the same for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant