JITENDRA PAL SINGH v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/16416/2026 · 2026-10-06
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12798 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12798 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16416 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:
"a) Issue, a writ, in the nature of Certiorari, Quashing the Impugned Transfer Order dated 03/09/2026, Passed by the Respondent No. 5, and as well as Consequential Relieving Order dated 24/09/2026 Passed by the Respondent No. 6 (enclosed as Annexure-1 & 2) to this writ petition. b) Issue, a writ order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities, Permitting the Petitioner to continue at his Present Place of Posting at Local intelligence Unit (LIU) Aligarh District Aligarh or to Accommodate the Petitioner at District Mathura, Gautam Budh Nagar, Ghaziabad, Bulandshahar, Hapur, or District Badaun in Local Intelligence Unit, (LIU) or Special Branch in Local Intelligence Unit."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been transferred by the order impugned though earlier the petitioner was transferred on compassionate ground in the year 2025 and now the petitioner has been transferred again. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner cannot be transferred within a short period once he has been transferred on the compassionate ground. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arya Gautam, Atipriya Gautam, Sr. Advocate, Vaishnavi Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jitendra Pal Singh .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted the petitioner may approach the authority i.e. respondent no. 2 for redressal of his grievance.
5. In view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to move a representation within a week. In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner within a week, the same shall be decided, by respondent no. 2, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of next four weeks after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment.
6. With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. October 7, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 16416 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad