2026:JHHC:15126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3642 of 2026 Bobby Deol, Son of Sanjay Saw … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 03/15.05.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026, registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-cyber-crime, Spl. Court, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2026 and three mobiles and four SIM cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He submits that five victims of very small amount each, have been identified. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has no other case instituted against him. He submits that the charge-sheet has already been submitted. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail. However, it is submitted that three mobile and three SIM recovered. He submits that altogether 7 crime links have been found. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2026:JHHC:15126 2 each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum-cyber-crime, Spl. Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:15.05.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:16.05.2026