Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12781 (JHR)

NAND KISHORE YADAV ALIAS GOLU YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4007/2026 · 2026-05-12

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:14358) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4007 of 2026 Nand Kishore Yadav @ Golu Yadav, aged about 24 years, son of Ramadhar Yadav, resident of village – Saket Nagar, PO & PS – Doranda, District – Ranchi. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 12th May, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No. 371 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 118(2), 303(2), 308(4), 49, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has attempted to commit murder of the informant’s son by stabbing with a knife. It is next submitted that the main allegation is against the co-accused person, namely, Sanjeev Upadhayay and the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.09.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate - IX, Ranchi, in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No. 371 of 2025, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 12.05.2026 Aditi