Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12780 (PNJ)

NEENA SINGLA v. AMARJEET SINGH AND ANR

COCP/581/2026 · 2026-04-06

Sudeepti Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-581-2026 (O&M) -1- 106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-581-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.04.2026 Neena Singla ......Petitioner Vs. Amarjeet Singh and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for non- complaince of an undertaking dated 01.07.2025 given by the respondents before learned Rent Controller, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali), in the Rent Petition No.49 of 2024, filed under Section 13 of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1949. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the undertaking dated 01.07.2025 given by the respondents has been complied with and they have vacated the possession of the property in question. 3. In view of the above, since an undertaking dated 01.07.2025 given by the respondents before learned Rent Controller, S.A.S. Nagar VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.04.07 13:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-581-2026 (O&M) -2- (Mohali), in the Rent Petition No.49 of 2024, has been complied with, therefore, the present contempt is purged and rule stands discharged. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 06.04.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.04.07 13:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document