2026:JHHC:15076 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2656 of 2026 ------ Suresh Hembrom, aged about 32 years, son of Late Mahadeo Manjhi, resident of Village Kalu Tand, P.O. Giddi, P.S. Giddi, District Hazaribag, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Prajapati, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, A.P.P. ------ 02/15.05.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 310(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and the name of the petitioner has come only on confessional statement. He submits in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that even the petitioner is having three criminal antecedents and serious allegations are there of presence on the spot along with 10 to 15 unknown persons armed with weapons and surrounded the informant and his friend and started assaulting and also snatched gold chain and ring, cash of Rs.90,000/-, two mobiles of informant and eight mobiles from informant’s friend on gun point and they threatened not to disclose the alleged incidence to anyone. 5. Considering that the petitioner is having three criminal antecedents however, it has been pointed out that in two of the cases, the petitioner has been acquitted and his accomplice have taken the name of the petitioner that he was also involved in crime and the allegations are serious of holding the informant and looting on the gun point, in the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby, rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 16.05.2026