Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12780 (GAU)

MRS PUSHPA RANI SINGHA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/4434/2026 · 2026-08-20

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010174792026 2026:GAU-AS:11986 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4434/2026 MRS PUSHPA RANI SINGHA W/O RUHIT BARAN SINGHAVILLAGE ALAKULIPARP.O. BADARPUR GHAT P.S. BADARPUR DIST. SRI BHUMI ASSAM PROPRIETOR OF M/S PRB TAILORING AND GARMENTS HAVING OFFICE AT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BADARPURGHAT DIST. SRI BHUMI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY INDUSTRIES, COMMERCE AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SRI BHUMI P.O.AND P.S. SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN 788803 3:THE COMMISSIONER OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE UDYOG BHAWAN BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI -781021 4:THE GENERAL MANAGER (IN-CHARGE) DISTRICT INDUSTRIES COMMERCE CENTRE SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN 788803 5:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI 781021 ASSAM 6:THE IN CHARGE ZONAL OFFICE ASIDC LTD BADARPUR GHAT SRIBHUMI Page No.# 2/2 PIN 788803 7:THE ESTATE OFFICER INDUSTRIES ESTATE BADARPUR GHATSRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN 78880 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. J PURKAYASTHA, MRS. S ROY Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, ASIDC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 21.08.2026 Heard Ms. S. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4; and Mr. S. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Assam Small Industries Development Corporation Limited [ASIDCL] for the respondent nos. 5, 6 & 7. In this writ petition instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed an Order of eviction no. KIDCC[IE]/7/2020-21/240 dated 14.08.2026 passed under the hand of the respondent no. 4. Mr. Das, learned Standing Counsel, ASIDCL has submitted that by an Office Letter no. KDICC[IE]/7/2020-21/380-383 dated 18.08.2026, the impugned eviction order has been cancelled and has placed a copy of the said Office Letter before the Court. As the Order of eviction no. KIDCC[IE]/7/2020-21/240 dated 14.08.2026 has already been cancelled, there is no surviving cause of action to proceed further with the present writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant