1 2026:CGHC:11911 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 255 of 2026 Shimpu S/o Jivadhan Jaiswal Aged About 24 Years R/o Village - Balangi, Police Out- Check Post - Balangi, P/s Raghunathnagar, Distt.- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) ...Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Police Out-Check Post- Balangi, Police Station- Raghunathnagar, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ...Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Shubham Tiwari, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order On Board 12.03.2026 1. This first anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 133/2025 registered at Police Station – Raghunathnagar, District - Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) for the offences punishable under Sections 296, 351(2), 115(2), 191(2), 333 of the BNS, 2023. 2. The prosecution story in brief is that, the complainant namely Jamuna Prasad Kesari lodged written complaint alleging that, on 20.09.2025 at VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2026.03.16 11:36:36 +0530 2 about 06:00PM he and his family members came from Wadrafnagar to his native place at Village-Balangi for ancestral immersion then in the mid night at about 02:11 AM the accused persons came by motor- cycle and car and abusing him and threatening to kill the complainant and his family member and the accused persons were also saying that, the complainant and his family members will be implicated in false case. It is further alleged that, the accused persons were also saying that, they are politically powerful and muscles persons therefore the complainant will not do anything against them. It is also alleged that, the accused persons after broken lock of the door they entered into house of the applicant with Lathi-Danda, Talwar and the accused persons were trying to complainant and his family to commit murder but after 10 to 15 minutes the accused persons went away, when the complainant came out from his room then he saw that, his pant along with Rs. 23,00/- was not there. The complainant lodged First Information Report for offence punishable under Section 296, 351(2), 115(2), 191(2), 333 of B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits the present accused/applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the present case by the complainant, and therefore this Hon’ble Court may kindly consider the facts of the case and grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. It is further submitted that the First Information Report has been lodged after a delay of about 15 days and there are no specific allegations made against the present applicant in the FIR. It is also submitted that the other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by the learned Court below and there is no material available on record connecting the present 3 applicant with the alleged offence. The applicant is about 24 years of age and his implication in the present case is wholly unjustified and appears to have been made with the intention of ruining his future. Therefore, it is prayed that the applicant may kindly be granted the benefit of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned State Counsel opposed the bail application and submitted that, as per the prosecution case, the complainant Jamuna Prasad Kesari lodged a report alleging that on the intervening night of 20.09.2025 at about 02:11 AM, the accused persons came to his house at Village Balangi by motorcycle and car, abused him and threatened to kill him and his family members. It is alleged that the accused persons broke the lock of the door and forcibly entered the house armed with lathi, danda and talwar and attempted to assault the complainant and his family members. Thereafter, when the complainant came out of his room, he found that his pant along with Rs. 23,000/- was missing. Therefore, considering the serious nature of the allegations, learned State Counsel prayed for rejection of the bail application. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the allegations and the material available on record, it appears that the complainant, Jamuna Prasad Kesari, has alleged that on the intervening night of 20.09.2025 at about 02:11 AM, the accused persons came to his house at Village Balangi by motorcycle and car, abused him and threatened to kill him and his family members. It is 4 further alleged that the accused persons broke open the lock of the door and forcibly entered the house armed with lathi, danda and talwar and attempted to assault the complainant and his family members with the intention to commit their murder. It is also alleged that after the accused persons left the place, the complainant found that his pant along with cash amounting to Rs. 23,000/- was missing. Considering the serious nature and gravity of the allegations, the manner in which the alleged incident has taken place, and the material available on record, this Court is of the considered opinion that it is not a fit case to grant the discretionary relief of anticipatory bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the application is liable to be and is hereby rejected. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant – Shimpu, involved in Crime No. 133/2025 registered at Police Station - Raghunathnagar, District – Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.) for the offences punishable under Sections 296, 351(2), 115(2), 191(2), 333 of the BNS,2023, is rejected. (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaibhav