M.Ammu v. The State Rep By The Superintendent of Police
CRL OP/7055/2026 · 2026-03-18
A D Jagadish Chandira
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12775 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12775 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.OP.No.7055 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.03.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.OP.No.7055 of 2026 M.Ammu ...Petitioner Vs. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by,
1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The District Police Office (SP Office), Ranipet District – 632 403.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Arakkonam, Ranipet District – 631 003.
3. The Inspector of Police, Arakkonam Town Police Station, Arakkonam, Ranipet District – 631 001.
4. The Inspector of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing (PEW) Police Station, Arakkonam, Ranipet District – 631 001. ...Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, seeking to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents herein not to harass the petitioner’s son without any complaint or allegations against the petitioner’s son under the guise of enquiry or investigation, except by following the due process of law. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.7055 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vijayanand For Respondents : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, APP
ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed seeking to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to harass the petitioner’s son under the guise of enquiry or investigation.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that there are three previous cases pending against the petitioner’s son and that he was called only for executing a bond under Section 110 of Cr.P.C. and that the respondent police are not harassing the petitioner and her family members.
3. Such being the position, it is for the Investigating Agency to issue appropriate notice to the petitioner’s son under Section 35(3) of BNSS for enquiry and on receipt of such notice, the petitioner’s son shall appear for enquiry and co-operate in the investigation. It is made clear that the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.7055 of 2026 petitioner and her family members shall not be harassed during the course of enquiry. If any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent Police shall register a First Information Report and proceed in accordance with law.
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 18.03.2026 skt NCC : Yes/No To:
1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The District Police Office (SP Office), Ranipet District – 632 403.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Arakkonam, Ranipet District – 631 003.
3. The Inspector of Police, Arakkonam Town Police Station, Arakkonam, Ranipet District – 631 001.
4. The Inspector of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing (PEW) Police Station, Arakkonam, Ranipet District – 631 001.
5. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.7055 of 2026 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. skt
Crl.OP.No.7055 of 2026 18.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis