Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12774 (KAR)

KANTHAMANI v. NIJAGUNAIAH H

MFA/9232/2025 · 2026-03-14

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI & MR.H.PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY., MEMBER M.F.A.No.9232 OF 2025 (Lok Adalat No.1221/2026) BETWEEN: 1. 2. 3. KANTHAMANI W/O. LATE GANGADHARAIAH NOW AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS KAVYA K. G D/O. LATE GANGADHARAIAH W/O. MANOHAR S S MAJOR R/A CHIKKANAHALLI KALLABELLA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT KARTHIK S/O LATE GANGADHARAIAH NOW AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/A KODINAGEHALLI VILLAGE NITTUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK TUMAKURU CITY ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI.RAGHU R., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 AND 1. 2. NIJAGUNAIAH H S/O. LATE HONNAIH NOW AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/A BASAVAPATTANA VILLAGE NITTUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK – 572 216 TUMAKURU DISTRICT ROYAL SUNDARAM GEN. INS. CO. LTD REP. BY ITS MANAGER SUDHAKARA H. NO.30, 3RD FLOOR, JNR CITY CENTER RAJA RAM MOHAN ROY ROAD SAMPANGIRAMA NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 027 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.S. JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.03.2025 PASSED IN MVC NO.232/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., GUBBI PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel for the appellants and the representative of the respondent – Insurance Company are present. 2. A joint memo is submitted today which reflects that the parties have settled on an amount of Rs.3,25,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Twenty Five Thousand Only), in addition to what has awarded by the Tribunal in full and final settlement of the claim. The respondent – Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Limited has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of the award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest @ 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 3. The memo is accepted and in view of the settlement, this appeal is disposed of. It is directed that the award be prepared no later than two months from today. The amount awarded by the Tribunal is permitted to be withdrawn by the claimants forthwith as per law. The amount that is settled today 4 is permitted to be withdrawn on deposit of the amount by the Insurance Company as per law. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KG