SMT. RAJKALI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIB/3785/2026 · 2026-10-06
Ashutosh Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12771 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12771 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3785 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for Goan Sabha.
2. The limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 i.e. Consolidation Officer, Sadar, District Prayagraj, to decide the objection of the petitioner dated 01.01.2017, arising out of Case No. 0203 of 2025 (State vs. Nand Lal), Computerized Case No. 20255402323060203, under Section 9A(2) of UPCH Act, pending before him, within the time frame fixed by this Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that application is pending consideration since long and the purpose of filing the present petition would stand served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforesaid application.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid proposition.
5. Considering the totality of the circumstances and submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would stand sub served if directions are issued for expeditious disposal of application.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no. 2 i.e. Consolidation Officer, Sadar, District Prayagraj, to decide the objection of the petitioner dated 01.01.2017, arising out of Case No. 0203 of 2025 (State vs. Nand Lal), Computerized Case No. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Krishna Tripathi, Ritwik Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Smt. Rajkali And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
20255402323060203, under Section 9A(2) of UPCH Act, on merits, strictly in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of service of certified copy of the order of this Court. October 7, 2026 v.k. updh.
WRIB No. 3785 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad