Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12763 (JHR)

VINAY KUMAR TIWARI THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATORY NAMELY MR. MANPRIT SINGH v. MRS. SUNITA NAIAR

C.M.P./1200/2025 · 2026-05-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:14086) 1 C.M.P. No.1200 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.1200 of 2025 ------ Vinay Kumar Tiwari, aged about 55 years, Son of Late Baleshwar Tiwari, Managing Director of Technoculture Building Centre Private Limited, Present office address- Ashiyana Trade Centre, 5th Floor, Room No.-518/519, P.O. & P.S.- Adityapur, District- Seraikela- Kharsawan, Jharkhand through its authorized representative/signatory namely Mr. Manprit Singh, aged about 43 years, Son of Sri Satwant Singh, Resident of – Panjabi Line, Mango, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.- Mango, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus Mrs. Sunita Naiar, Wife of Mr. Ravi Shankar K.P., Resident of 12/1, Narmada/Vastu- Vihar Colony, Baikunthnagar, Gurudawara Road, Mango, P.O. & P.S.- Mango, District- East-Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … Opposite Party ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vinay Kumar Lall, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Advocate ------ P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY By the Court:- Heard the parties. 2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India without any specific prayer and vague and vexatious averments. 3. It has been mentioned in the instant petition that the District Consumer Forum, Jamshedpur at East Singhbhum vide order dated 16.09.2025 has passed some order which is incongruous from this (2026:JHHC:14086) 2 C.M.P. No.1200 of 2025 petition. The certified copy of the order which has been annexed as Annexure-4 goes to show that the petitioner who was the opposite party in Consumer Case No.55 of 2009, on 16.09.2025 filed petition for time which was rejected and later on a petition was filed for time to prefer a revision against the order dated 16.09.2025 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Jamshedpur and the same was allowed. 4. Therefore, this Court finds that the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition is a frivolous one. Accordingly, the same is dismissed with a warning to the petitioner not to indulge in filing such frivolous petitions in future. 5. In view of disposal of the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition, the interim order dated 23.12.2025, is vacated. 6. Registry is directed to intimate the Forum concerned forthwith. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 11th of May, 2026 AFR/ Animesh Uploaded on- 12 /05/2026