KISHORI @ KISHOR SINGH @ KISHORE KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3072/2026 · 2026-05-15
Rajesh Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12762 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12762 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:15010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3072 of 2026 ---- Kishori @ Kishor Singh @ Kishore Kumar Singh, aged about 74 years, S/o Late Lal Govind Singh, R/o Village Tarapur, P.O. + P.S. Karon, District Deoghar
…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, A.P.P.
----
04/Dated: 15th May, 2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant, who is in custody since 04.09.2023, has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No.514 of 2023, arising out of Karon P.S. Case No.37 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Madhupur. The charge has been framed on 19.04.2024 under Sections 302/34 and 304B/34 of the IPC.
3. The prayer for bail of the applicant were earlier rejected by this Court vide orders dated 12.02.2024 & 18.08.2025 passed in B.A. No.11641 of 2023 and B.A. No.8575 of 2024 respectively. It is a third attempt.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. Prayer for bail of the applicant has been renewed stating that the charge has been already framed and out of nineteen charge-sheeted witnesses, twelve witnesses have been examined. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
5.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
2026:JHHC:15010
Page | 2
B.A. No.3072 of 2026
6. Considering the nature of crime, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail of the appellant. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the applicant is hereby, rejected once again.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Dated 15th May, 2026 Raja/Uploaded on 16.05.2026