Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12754 (JHR)

SUNITA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

C.Rev./2/2024 · 2026-05-08

Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No. 02 of 2024 ------ Sunita Devi, aged about 47 years, W/o Late Laxmi Narayan Singh, resident of Qr. No. M-19, Sudamdih Main Colony, P.O. – Sudamdih, P.S. Sudamdih, Distrcit – Dhanbad ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand; 2. P.V.K.R. Malika Arjun Rao, son of not known to the petitioner, Director (Personnel), Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Koula Bhawan, P.O. – Koyla Nagar, P.S. – Sariadhella, District – Dhanbad, Jharkhand; 3. Sahdeo Maji, son of not known to the petitioner, Project Officer, Patherdih Colliery, Eastern Jharia Area, Bharat Coking Coal Limited P.O. and P.S. Patherdih, District – Dhanbad, Jharkhand; 4. Animesh Bharti, son of not known to the petitioner, Regional Commissioner, Cola Mines Provident Fund, P.O., P.S. and District – Dhanbad, Jharkhand ... Opp. Parties CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrendra Pradhan, Advocate For the CMPFO : Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, Advocate : Mr. Karbir, Advocate For the BCCL : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate ------ 09/Dated: 8th May, 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some argument, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present application with a liberty to ventilate his grievance by searching out the remedy. 2. Such submission has been made in the presence of the learned 2026:JHHC:14144 counsel appearing for the opposite parties. 3. As such, the instant application being Civil Review No. 02 of 2024 is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, and as such disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 8th May, 2026 Samarth