Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12750 (BOM)

Chandrakant Shankar Thakur v. State of Maharashtra

REVN/67/2026 · 2026-09-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

4-REVN-67-2026 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2026 Chandrakant Shankar Thakur ...Applicant VERSUS State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Mr.Rahul Thakur a/w Mr.Akshay Kamble, for the Applicant. Mr.B.B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State. Mr.P.V. More, LHC-107, EOW, Raigad _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent-State. 2. The learned APP submit that Appeal would lie against the order of the MPID Court. 3. Considering the submission of the learned APP, the learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw of this Application with liberty to file fresh Appeal. 4. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the Applicant, the Application is allowed to withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Digitally signed by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2026.09.30 13:01:58 +0530 4-REVN-67-2026 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble 5. If any proceeding is filed the Registry shall not raise issue of limitation. 6. All pending Applications are disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)