Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12747 (CHH)

SMT. MITA MAHANT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2269/2026 · 2026-03-08

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:11237 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2269 of 2026 1 - Smt. Mita Mahant Wd/o Late Laxman Das Mahant Aged About 48 Years R/o Daihanpara, Village- Devgaon, Post- Ranjana, Tehsil- Katghora, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - District Education Officer District Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - Block Education Officer, Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh 4 - Jai Prakash Mahant S/o Late Laxman Das Mahant R/o Daihanpara, Village- Devgaon, Post- Ranjana, Tehsil- Katghora, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Suryapratap Yudhveer Singh, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3/State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 09 /03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may please be kind enough in quashing and setting-aside the impugned order (Annexure P/1). 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may please be kind enough in directing the respondent authorities to reconsider the application of the petitioner and grant 2 the compassionate appointment to the petitioner within reasonable time 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may please be kind enough in granting cost, consequential benefits and any other relief to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the Respondents/State submits that the claim of the petitioner has not been rejected, but the competent authority has only asked for the petitioner to submit the appropriate documents, in particular, Succession Certificate issued by the competent Court in view of the objection raised by the son of the deceased employee. 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum for obtaining the Succession Certificate as observed in the letter dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P/1). 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY