GIRRAJ SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/12006/2025 · 2026-10-04
Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Rajeev Misra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12742 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12742 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12006 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. Even though the names of Mr. Sarvind Kumar Pandey and Mr. Saurabh Pandey are duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioners, but neither they nor anyone on their behalf is present to press the present writ petition, even in revised call.
2. Learned AGA representing the State-respondents 1 and 2 is present.
3. Perused the record.
4. Petitioners Girraj Singh and two others have approached this Court by means of present criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17.4.2025 lodged by first informant-respondent 3, Smt. Sarvesh and registered as Case Crime No. 0073 of 2025, under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506 BNS, Police Station - Mainather, District - Moradabad.
5. On the matter being taken up, learned AGA representing State respondents 1, 2 submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer, upon completion of statutory investigation of aforementioned case crime number, in terms of Chapter XIII BNSS, has already forwarded the charge sheet/police report dated 10.7.2025 in terms of Section 193(3) BNSS. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarvind Kumar Pandey, Saurabh Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Girraj Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. In view of above, in all probability, cognizance upon aforesaid charge sheet/police report must have been taken by the jurisdictional magistrate. In view of above, we are of the considered view that by efflux of time, present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
7. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
October 5, 2026 S.K.S.
CRLP No. 12006 of 2025 2 (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad