CWP-5667- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (216) Harsh Kumar State of Haryana CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a respondents, to issue original mark sheets, origi (Hons.) five year course, attendance certificate and character certificate of the petitioner, as the petitioner has completed the said course after paying the requisite fee of all representation dated 04.02.2026 (Annexure P 2. very outset, (Annexure P expeditiously. He further submits that he has no objection, in case a -2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Harsh Kumar Singh Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Kushager Goyal, Advocate for Ms. Pallavi Babbar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Jagbir Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, cast under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a respondents, to issue original mark sheets, origi five year course, attendance certificate and character certificate of the petitioner, as the petitioner has completed the said course after paying the requisite fee of all the semester. Further, prayer is made for deciding his representation dated 04.02.2026 (Annexure P Learned counsel representing the respondents No.2 and 3, at the very outset, fairly submits that the representation (Annexure P-7), preferred by the petitioner expeditiously. He further submits that he has no objection, in case a 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5667-2026 Date of Decision : 17.04.2026 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Kushager Goyal, Advocate for Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana Through the instant writ petition, cast under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the respondents, to issue original mark sheets, original degree of B.A. LL.B five year course, attendance certificate and character certificate of the petitioner, as the petitioner has completed the said course after paying the semester. Further, prayer is made for deciding his representation dated 04.02.2026 (Annexure P-7), in a time bound manner. Learned counsel representing the respondents No.2 and 3, at the fairly submits that the representation dated 04.02.2026 by the petitioner shall be decided most expeditiously. He further submits that he has no objection, in case a Through the instant writ petition, cast under Article 226 of the , upon the nal degree of B.A. LL.B five year course, attendance certificate and character certificate of the petitioner, as the petitioner has completed the said course after paying the semester. Further, prayer is made for deciding his Learned counsel representing the respondents No.2 and 3, at the .2026 shall be decided most MANPREET SINGH expeditiously. He further submits that he has no objection, in case a 2026.04.20 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-5667- mandamus is passed upon the respondent No.2, to decide the representation (supra), subject to furnishing requisite 3. a direction upon the respondent No.2, furnishing of requisite fee receipts, of receipt of certified copy of this order 4. within the stipulated period. opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, shall decide th preferred by the petitioner. 5. April 17, 202 Manpreet -2026 is passed upon the respondent No.2, to decide the representation , subject to furnishing requisite fee receipts In view of the above, the instant writ petition is a direction upon the respondent No.2, to decide the representation (supra) furnishing of requisite fee receipts, within a period of 15 days, from of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to approach the respondent No.2, within the stipulated period. Thereafter, the latter shall opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, shall decide th preferred by the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 is passed upon the respondent No.2, to decide the representation fee receipts by the petitioner. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with to decide the representation (supra), on within a period of 15 days, from the date The petitioner is directed to approach the respondent No.2, the latter shall, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, shall decide the representation (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No is passed upon the respondent No.2, to decide the representation with on the date The petitioner is directed to approach the respondent No.2, after affording due e representation MANPREET SINGH 2026.04.20 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment