SMT. KAJAL PAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/11632/2025 · 2026-10-04
Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Rajeev Misra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12739 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12739 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11632 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. Case called out in revised list. Even though the names of Mr. Sanskar Gaur, Neetu Mishra, and Sadanand Mishra are duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioners, but neither they nor anyone on their behalf is present to press the present writ petition even in revised call.
2. Learned AGA representing State respondents 1, 2, 3 is present.
3. Petitioner Smt. Kajal Pal and another have approached this Court by means of present criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the impugned FIR dated 22.05.2025 lodged by first informant respondent 4 Shiv Shankar Pal and registered as Case Crime No. 0199 of 2025, under Section 87 BNS, Police Station - Mariayahu, District - Jaunpur.
4. On the matter being taken up, the learned AGA representing State respondents 1, 2, 3 submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer, upon completion of statutory investigation of aforementioned case crime number in terms of Chapter XII CrPC, has forwarded the final report/police report dated 08.06.2025 in terms of Section 173(2) CrPC.
5. On the above premise, the learned AGA submits that no cause of action now survives with petitioners to press the present writ petition. As such, present writ petition is liable to be dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neetu Mishra, Sanskar Gaur, Satanand Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Kajal Pal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Since no one appears on behalf of petitioner to press the present writ petition, therefore considering the objections raised by the learned AGA in opposition to present writ petition as noted herein above, this writ petition shall stand dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
7. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. October 5, 2026 S.K.S.
CRLP No. 11632 of 2025 2 (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad