2026:JHHC:14479 --1-- A.B.A. No. 841 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 841 of 2026 ---- 1. Rajesh Ravidas @ Rajesh Kumar Ram, aged about 29 years, S/o Deglal Ravidas 2. Ashok Ravidas, aged about 33 years, S/o Deglal Ravidas 3. Rajendra Ravidas, aged about 34 years, S/o Moti Ravidas 4. Budhani Devi, aged about 58 years, W/o Deglal Ravidas, All are resident of Jarkunda, PO – Konaradam, PS – Chatrochatti, District – Bokaro, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. Birendra Prasad, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate :- Mr. Vikesh Kumar, Advocate ---- 04/12.05.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Informant. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chatrochatti P.S. Case No.31 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(1), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 127(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that 2026:JHHC:14479 --2-- A.B.A. No. 841 of 2026 the anticipatory bail of petitioner No.2 has already been withdrawn in light of order dated 19.02.2026 and in view of that this petition is surviving only for petitioner Nos.1, 3 and 4. He further submits that there are case and counter case between the parties and both the sides are agnates. He then submits that allegation of assault is false and in view of that the anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant jointly opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioners have entered into the house of the informant and thereafter they have assaulted and grievous injury has been received by one Loknath. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the Informant further submits that now also the informant is being threatened by the petitioners to withdraw the present case and for that the informant has informed the police station by way of writing in complaint. On this ground, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 6. Considering that there is direct allegation of assault and pursuant to that grievous injury has been received by one Loknath and even now the informant side are being threatened to withdraw the present case and for that the information has been given to the concerned police station by the informant and in view of that I am not inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner Nos.1 and 3 namely Rajesh Ravidas @ Rajesh Kumar Ram and Rajendra Ravidas respectively. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner 2026:JHHC:14479 --3-- A.B.A. No. 841 of 2026 Nos.1 and 3, above named, respectively are hereby rejected. 7. So far petitioner No.4 is concerned, she is lady and aged about 58 years and there are general and omnibus allegation against her and in view of that I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner No.4 namely Budhani Devi. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner No.4, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of her surrender/arrest, the petitioner No.4, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Chatrochatti P.S. Case No.31 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 12.05.2026 Sangam/