SMT SUMAN AND ANOTHER v. PREM PRAKASH BHATIYA AND 4 OTHERS
A227/289/2026 · 2026-10-06
Y K Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12738 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12738 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 289 of 2026 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Sri Kuldeep Kumar, counsel appearing for the respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 has pointed out that pursuant to the orders impugned in the present petition, which arise from proceedings under Section 21(1)(a) of the Act No.13 of 1972, the parties have entered into a settlement during the course of execution proceedings being MRC No.21 of 2026. The settlement is said to have been incorporated in the order dated 19.9.2026, passed by the Judge, Small Causes Court, Bulandshahr. It is submitted that in view of the said development, no cause-of-action survives in the present petition. Sri Shreyansh Pathak, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Sunil Kumar, counsel for the petitioners has not disputed the aforestated development, and also that no cause-of-action survives. The petition stands dismissed accordingly. October 7, 2026 Arun K. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kuldeep Kumar (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Smt Suman And Another .....Petitioner(s) Prem Prakash Bhatiya And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad