MANGALAM FASHIONS LTD v. INDIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LTD
LPA/525/2026 · 2026-07-20
Tejas Karia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12736 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12736 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 525/2026 & CM APPL. 44921-23/2026 MANGALAM FASHIONS LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr.Naresh Balodia, Mr.Divakar Kumar and Mr.Madhukant Jha, Advs. versus INDIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sangram Patnaik, Mr.Shivam Pal Sharma, Mr.Arpit Bamal, Mr.Swayamsiddha Patnaik, Advs. CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R %
20.07.2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. It has been argued on behalf of the appellant that though learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition instituted by the appellant relying upon the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court, in the case of RBA Properties Ltd. & Anr. .V Ministry of New and Renewable Energy &Anr. [LPA 668/2018] decided on 19.12.2018, however, in paragraph 5 of the impugned judgment, statement made on behalf of the respondent was recorded to the effect that there was not even a single case where benefit of GBI II was granted to entities beyond the prescribed period. 3. His submission is that the said statement is belied by information This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2026 at 12:04:12
received by the appellant under the Right to Information Act, 2005 which was furnished to the appellant vide letter dated 16.06.2026 of the Central Public Information Officer of the respondent. Since, the information now being relied upon in this Letters Patent Appeal is said to have been furnished to the appellant on 16.06.2026, i.e. after the impugned judgment by learned Single Judge was passed; it appears to be a case of review. 4. The said submission made on behalf of the appellant is being disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent. 5. Accordingly, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal; however, we grant liberty to the appellant to seek review of the impugned order dated 11.05.2026, passed by the learned Single Judge. 6. The instant appeal along with pending applications is, thus, dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J JULY 20, 2026/MJ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2026 at 12:04:12