IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Review Petition No. 60 of 2026 Decided on 22.6.2026 Yog Raj …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Devender Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) The petitioner is seeking review of the judgment, passed by this Court in CWP No. 6303 of 2026, dated 13.5.2026 in terms whereof, the petition was disposed of in the following terms: “As the petitioner has approached the Court directly without firstly approaching the competent Authority, as prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioner filing a separate representation with regard to the issue raised in this petition to the competent Authority within a period of four weeks from today, let the same be decided in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks thereafter, in view of the averments made therein as well as judgments, if any, being relied upon by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the averments made in the writ petition and also the relief clause therein and submitted that in the present case, the representation of the petitioner seeking regularization stood rejected by the authority on 4.12.2024 and that the petitioner had approached the Court seeking relief thereof with further regularization as per the Policy of the State Government. He further submitted that this fact could not be brought to the notice of the Court when the petition was disposed of. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that as the representation of the petitioner stands rejected, it would be in the interest of justice, in case this review petition is allowed and the order passed by the Court is recalled. 3. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that State has no objection if the prayer is allowed. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the order passed in the writ petition as well as the relief, as prayed for, the instant review petition is allowed and order dated 13.5.2026 is recalled. CWP No.6303 of 2026 is restored to its original number. 5. With these observations, the review petition is disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 22, 2026 (Guleria)