Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40550 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Heard Sri V.K.Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and R.P.Singh, learned Advocate assisted by Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned counsel for the respondent as to the maintainability of this petition on the ground that Gram Pradhan of the village has engaged private counselor, hence this petition in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Babu Ram Verma v. Sub Divisional Officer and Others, 1996 LawSuit (All) 645, decided on on 19th January, 1996, private counselor cannot be engaged except with approval of the District Magistrate/Collector.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach this Court again in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for the respondent does not have objection to the above request. Petition is accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. October 7, 2026 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Srivastava, Vivek Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhanu Pratap Singh Kachhawah, C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Urvesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad