RAJ KUMAR v. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board
CWP/9890/2026 · 2026-06-22
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12728 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12728 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Raj Kumar vs State of HP and another
CWP No. 9890 of 2026
22.06.2026 Present: Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, learned Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to place on record the communication, in terms whereof, the representation of the petitioner has been rejected. Let needful be done within one week. List thereafter.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
June 22, 2026
(narender)