1 2026:CGHC:11380 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1003 of 2026 Anant Puri Goswami S/o Lt. Shri Damodar Puri Goswami Aged About 59 Years R/o Sundar Nagar, Behind Hero Showroom, Raipur Road Bemetara, District- Bemetara (Cg) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2 - The Collector Bemetara, District- Bemetara (CG) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bemetara, District- Bemetara (CG) 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil Bemetara, District- Bemetara (CG) 5 - Au Small Finance Bank Ltd Through Its Manager Dheeraj Pandey, S/o Vivekanand Panday, Aged 44 Years, Branch Office- 3rd Floor, Sky Plaza Gaurav Path Near Banthia Hospital. Raja Talab Raipur (CG) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shantam Awasthi, Advocate For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Pawan Kumar Kashyap, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 10.3.2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:- “i. To kindly issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Tehsildar notice dated BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.03.11 10:59:37 +0530 2 27.02.2026 and, after examination, quash and set aside the same as illegal, arbitrary, and a product of fraudulent concealment of material facts; ii. To kindly issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, declaring the underlying proceedings initiated by the Bank under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to be void ab initio on account of the perjury committed by the Bank's authorized officer in the affidavit filed before the District Magistrate; iii. To kindly direct the Respondent Bank to maintain status quo in respect of the physical possession and title of the secured asset during the pendency of the present petition; iv. To kindly grant any other relief(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to allow the above prayer of the petitioner. 4. On due consideration, prayer is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy, if any, available to him under the law. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini