Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12725 (JHR)

MD. IMTIYAZ ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4035/2026 · 2026-05-12

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14365 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4035 of 2026 ------ Md. Imtiyaz Ansari, Aged about 35 years, Son of Md. Asin, Resident of Village-Bara Bhorai, P.O. P.S.-Lalmatia, District-Godda, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.2 Dated-12-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Lalmatiya P.S. Case No.94 of 2025, registered for the alleged offence Under Sections-351(2), 351(3), 352, 326(g), 327(1) & 3(5) of B.N.S. & Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance with common intention with the co-accused persons, fired one round from firearm and set on fire 65 dozer dowsing it with petrol causing serious damage to the same. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR yet without putting him in Test Identification Parade, as mentioned in Para-12 of the bail application, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 30.12.2025 as mentioned in Para-16 and there is no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail in B.A. No2596 of 2026 vide order dated 24.03.2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda in connection with Lalmatiya P.S. Case No.94 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-12.05.2026-R. Kumar/ Uploaded on 14.05.2026