Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
3. BA 3608-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3608 OF 2026 Shivam Dadhav Fulavale .Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Ms. Pooja Agarwal, Advocate, for the Applicant Ms. Sangeeta Phad, APP, for the Respondent – State Mr. Aniket Nikam a/w. Mr. Hrishi Ghorpade, Mr. Siddharth Sutaria & Mr. Yashraj Pansare, Advocates, for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : 28.09.2026 P. C.
1. List the matter before the appropriate Bench in view of prayer clause (a).
2. After this order is passed, learned Advocate for the Applicant informs the Court that she would like to withdraw the Application and file a fresh Application in accordance with law.
3. Ms. Agarwal submits that there is a mistake in the prayer clauses and she would like to rectify the same and file a fresh Bail Application before the concerned roaster Court.
4. Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
5. Bail Application is disposed.
(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) Anand 1 of 1 ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Digitally signed by ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Date: 2026.09.30 12:43:11 +0530