Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12710 (ALL)

SMT. SAROJ DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/22109/2025 · 2026-10-04

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22109 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Sri R.K. Tripathi, learned Additional Standing Counsel, appears for the State respondents. 2. This Court, has passed the following order on 14.07.2025:- "1. The order dated 01.05.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Deoria by which financial and administrative power of the petitioner has been ceased is under challenge in the present writ petition. 2. The relevant findings were recorded in the aforesaid order, which reads as follows :- "प्रधान पित की फमर् ओम साई ट्रेिडग कम्पनी को भुगतान करने तथा सामुदाियक शौचालय के स्थल िवकास का अिभलेख उपलब्ध न कराने तथा वृक्षारोपण कायर् में मु 0 17340.00 रू० एवं मु0 33660.00 रु० कु ल शासकीय धनरािश मु0 51000.00 (इक्यावन हजार रू०) का दुरूपयोग करने के िलए प्रथम दृष्टया दोषी है।" 3. Nothing has been stated in the entire writ petition regarding the findings as recorded in this regard. 4. As prayed, two week's time is granted to counsel for the petitioner to file supplementary affidavit. 5. List on 05.08.2025 within top ten cases." 3. However, the petitioner has failed to file the supplementary affidavit despite the said permission. 4. Apart from the aforesaid, in view of the subsequent events, that tenure of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anisha Singh, R.K Singh Gaharwar, Ram Pratap Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Saroj Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) the Pradhan has already over and he is exercising only administrative powers terms of the Government Order dated 25.05.2026 and 29.05.2026. The petitioner has also not been able to demonstrate that any further subsisting right remains in his favour. 5. It is also taken note that on further proceeding fresh order has been passed, therefore, in view of the subsequent developments also. There is no reason to interfere with the impugned order. 6. Even otherwise, the order dated 14.07.2025 has not been complied with by the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, no interference is warranted. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. October 5, 2026 Priyanka WRIC No. 22109 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRIYANKA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad