Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12706 (JHR)

KALLU ANSARI ALIAS RAMJAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2624/2026 · 2026-05-14

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:14783 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 2624 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2624 of 2026 1. Kallu Ansari @ Ramjan, aged about 26 years, S/o Tabarak Miyan @ Taburuk Ansari 2. Md. Ikram @ Md. Ikran, aged about 22 years, S/o Md. Moin Ansari Both R/o Village- Nagarwa Patthar, P.O. Karharbari, P.S. Giridih (Muffasil), District- Giridih … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P. ----- 02/14.05.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No.59/2024, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 307, 302 of the IPC, pending in the Court of the learned C.J.M., Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the altercation took place due to land dispute. He next submits that the allegation of assault is there against one Md. Imran and pursuant to that son of the informant has received injury and subsequently he has died. He also submits that so far as these petitioners are concerned, only allegations are there that they were present on the spot. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioners were present on the spot. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the allegations of assault are there against Md. Imran. So far as these petitioners are ( 2026:JHHC:14783 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 2624 of 2026 concerned, they are said to be present on the spot. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No.59/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 14th May, 2026 Ajay/