Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.9744 of 2026 Decided on: 22.06.2026 Chhape Ram & others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioners: Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Having heard learned Counsel for the petitioners for some this, this Court is of the considered view that the issues being raised by the petitioners herein are pre-mature. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that interest of justice would be served in case the respondents are directed to decide the representation filed by the petitioners expeditiously.
2. Without making any observation on the merit of representation, present petition is disposed of as pre-mature, but with the direction that the representation filed by the petitioners be decided by the Authorities within two weeks. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge June 22, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?