Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12702 (ALL)

RAMA SHUKLA v. KAMLESH KUMAR AND 11 OTHERS

A227/14075/2026 · 2026-10-06

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14075 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction upon learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sharki, Prayagraj to decide 6-C application filed in Suit No. 1010 of 2025. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C, in case, the same is pending consideration in Suit No. 1010 of 2025, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 7, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeet Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Rama Shukla .....Petitioner(s) Kamlesh Kumar And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad