1 2026:CGHC:4698 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10656 of 2019 Daya Shankar Mishra S/o Late Shri Shyam Lal Mishra Aged About 49 Years Working On The Post Of Fan Khalasi Bangwar Project R/o Shiv Mandir Dafai Qt. No. 20/7 Amalai District Anuppur (M. P.), District : Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - South Eastern Coal Field Limited, Through Its Chief Managing Director ( C M D ) S E C L Bhawan Seepat Road Sarkanda Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Deputy General Manager, Amlai Bangwar - Damini, Amlai District - Anuppur ( M. P. ), District : Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh 3 - Miner Manager Bangwar District Annupur (M. P. ), District : Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. Vaibhav Singh, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 28.01.2026 1. Heard. 2. In this writ petition, by order dated 20.11.2019 (Annexure-P/01), petitioner’s representation has been rejected by the respondent-SECL on the ground that other writ petitions are pending in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the writ petitions filed before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh have already been withdrawn, the respondents be directed to consider the case of the petitioner afresh with regard correction of his date of birth, which submission, has not been opposed by learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 4. Be that as it may, the respondents are directed to consider the representation/case of the petitioner afresh qua correction of his date of birth within 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order in accordance with law by passing reasons and speaking order. 5. With aforesaid observation, direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if