.APHC010459352026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 25465/2026 Between: 1. ISAN CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. ANIL KUMAR HAVING ITS INDIAN BRANCH OFFICE AT 205, S2 FLOOR, TOWER-A, URBTECH TRADE CENTRE, SECTOR-132, NOIDA-201304, UTTAR PRADESH. 2. SPECIALISED ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT LTD,, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. ANIL KUMAR HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT FLAT NO-103, SOM VIHAR APARTMENTS, SECTOR-12, R.K PURAM, NEW DELHI-110022. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. AMARAVATI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITEDADCL, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, BLOCK-4, NEAR APCRDA PROJECT OFFICE, RAYAPUDI POST, TULLURU MANDAL, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237. 3. A P CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APCRDA, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, APCRDA PROJECT OFFICE, RAYAPUDI POST, TULLURU MANDAL, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237. 2 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, AMARAVATI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (ADCL), BLOCK-4, NEAR APCRDA PROJECT OFFICE, RAYAPUDI POST, TULLURU MANDAL, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237. 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNINGDEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 4,5, to implement and give full effect to the Order's 03.10.2023 passed in W.P. No.3474 of 2023 is illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principle of Natural Justice and offends the remedies of Constitutional of India and consequently directing the Respondents Nos.l, 4 and 5 to release and pay to the Petitioners the sum of Rs.3,88,60,066/- (Rupees Three Crore Eighty-Eight Lakhs Sixty Thousand and Sixty-Six only) to the Petitioners within a time-bound period fixed by this Hon'ble Court, together with such interest and this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents to place before this Hon'ble Court the present status of implementation of the Judgment dated 03.10.2023 in W.P. No.3474 of 2023, including the steps taken for release of Rs.3,88,60,066/- to the Petitioners, Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SIMHACHALAM KARUKOLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. 3. S PRANATHI 3 4. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 25465 of 2026 ORDER: The present writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 4,5, to implement and give full effect to the Order's 03.10.2023 passed in W.P. No.3474 of 2023 is illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principle of Natural Justice and offends the remedies of Constitutional of India and consequently directing the Respondents Nos.1, 4 and 5 to release and pay to the Petitioners the sum of Rs.3,88,60,066/- (Rupees Three Crore Eighty-Eight Lakhs Sixty Thousand and Sixty-Six only) to the Petitioners within a time-bound period fixed by this Hon'ble Court, together with such interest and this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and pass…... ” 2. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is that petitioner No.1 herein is a reputed multinational engineering services company offering engineering and technical services for development projects, including building construction, water infrastructure, and land and urban development. Petitioner No.2 is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and is one of the leading consulting firms specializing in highway and bridge design, pavement management solutions, etc. Respondent No.4 issued work orders to the petitioners for organizing several events. The said events were successfully organized by the petitioners, pursuant to which bills were submitted to Respondent Nos.2 and 3. However, the respondents made only part payments, leaving an outstanding amount of Rs.3,88,60,066/- (Rupees Three Crore Eighty-Eight Lakhs Sixty Thousand and Sixty-Six only), apart from 5 applicable GST. The petitioners made several representations requesting the respondents to release the amounts due and payable to them. However, despite such representations, the respondents have not released the outstanding amounts till date. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing counsel appearing for the 1st respondent. 4. During the course of hearing, learned Standing counsel furnished a copy of the instructions dated 25.09.2026 of the Chair Person & Managing Director of the 1st respondent. The said instructions disclose that the work executed by the petitioners and the amount payable to them, to the tune of Rs.3,88,60,066/-, have been admitted. It is further stated that ADCL would require a period of two months to complete the administrative process for release of the admitted amount to the petitioners. 5. Taking into consideration the admission made in the instructions furnished on behalf of Respondent No.1 with regard to the amount payable to the petitioners, and without going into the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pay the admitted amount of Rs.3,88,60,066/- to the petitioners within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As far as interest component is concerned, if there is any subsisting clause in the agreement/work order envisaging payment of interest upon any amount, 6 which is due and payable, the same is binding upon both the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 28.09.2026 KA 7 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 25465 of 2026 Date: 28.09.2026 KA