Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:776 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/376/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Mr. Vinoda Nand Barthwal, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing.
2. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Petitioner retired from a Group-D post in 2009. He has filed this writ petition challenging
order dated 28.11.2017, issued by Principal Secretary, Finance, Government of Uttarakhand. By the said order, it was provided that the excess payment, if made to Government servants, may be recovered from their salary. No order of recovery has been passed against the petitioner and petitioner retired long back in 2009.
4. Learned State Counsel is right in submitting that there is no cause of action available to the petitioner for which he could have filed this writ petition. He further submits that no legal injury has also been caused to the petitioner.
5. This Court do not find any reason to entertain the writ petition, which is without any cause of action.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is dismissed.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
11.02.2026 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f48 7df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819D A875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.02.11 16:56:19 +05'30'