Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:30349] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11283/2026 CNR: RJHC020673582026 | URN: CRLMB / 20833U / 2026
1. Harish S/o Hameeda, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Sadan Ka Bas Lalpur, Police Station Kama District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg)
2. Afzal S/o Habbi @ Habiv, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Sadan Ka Bas Lalpur, Police Station Kama District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg) ----petitionerss Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For petitioners(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 04/08/2026
1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.06/2024 registered at Police Station Kama, District Deeg for offences under Sections 143, 323, 341 & 307 IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as per contents of the FIR the main allegation for inflicting firearm injuries was attributed to co-accused namely Habbi @ Habib, who along with other accused Kasid have been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order
[2026:RJ-JP:30349] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11283/2026] dated 13.12.2024. He further submits that other co-accused Aashik and Insaf have been enlarged on bail by this Court on 08.07.2025 and co-accused Varis has been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 02.07.2026. The petitioners has been in judicial custody since 16.06.2026. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Harish S/o Hameeda and Afzal S/o Habbi @ Habiv, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 103 - RAVI KHANDELWAL