DHRUVI KEKIN GALA v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU KDEPT. AND ORS
WP/12843/2026 · 2026-09-30
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12688 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12688 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
sr.903-wp-12843-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12843 OF 2026 Dhruvi Kekin Gala .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Adv. Kunal Bhanage i/b Adv. Shashank Shubham for the Petitioner. Adv. Dhruti Kapadia a/w Adv. Kavita Dhanuka for Respondent No.5- CET Cell. Adv. Rui Rodrigues for Respondent No.4. Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, Addl. GP and Ms. Vaishali S. Nimbalkar, AGP for State.
CORAM:
R.I. CHAGLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE:
SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 P. C.
1. In the present Petition, the Petitioner has sought directions to Respondent No.3 CET Cell to permit the Petitioner to participate in the Undergraduate Medical Course for the Academic Year 2026-27 from the Persons with Disability (PwD) quota. An Eligibility Certificate has been obtained by the Petitioner on 22nd September 2026 which certifies that the Petitioner belongs to Persons with Disability (PwD). The Eligibility SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 Mansi shelke MANSI DHANANJAY SHELKE Digitally signed by MANSI DHANANJAY SHELKE Date: 2026.09.30 18:32:03 +0530
sr.903-wp-12843-2026.doc
Certificate is annexed as Exhibit ‘H’ to the Petition. 2. Pursuant to the Eligibility Certificate having been obtained by the Petitioner, the Medical Council Committee (MCC), DGHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, has carried out the requisite correction in the application form of the Petitioner by reflecting that the Petitioner is a Person with Disability. 3. In a similar case as the present viz., Kushi Budhwani Vs. Union of India and Others, Writ Petition (L) No.27204 of 2026, this Court had considered relief similar to that sought for by the Petitioner to take part in the CAP Rounds under PwD – Open Category, provided seats under the said Category were available. 4. Dr. Dhruti Kapadia, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 State UCG Cell, has opposed the relief sought for in the Petition on the ground that the Petitioner was well aware of the schedule of CAP Rounds. She submitted that in the case of Kushi Budhwani (supra) the CAP Round 1 had yet to commence, and at that stage the Court had passed the Order allowing the Petitioner to take part in CAP Rounds under PWD Open Category, provided seats under the said category were available. Page 2 of 5 SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 Mansi shelke
sr.903-wp-12843-2026.doc
5. We have considered the submissions. This Court, in Aachal Sachin Dhakre Vs. The State of Maharashtra through its Department of Medical Education and Drugs, Mantralaya and Ors. in Writ Petition No. 12586 of 2026, Order dated 23rd September, 2026, had considered a case similar to the present case where the Petitioner was seeking a direction to the State CET Cell to allow the Petitioner to participate in CAP Round 3 onwards under PwD OBC Category and allow her to avail benefits under the said categories.
This is in view of the eligibility certificate having been obtained by the Petitioner on 6th September, 2026 which certified that the Petitioner belonged to the said category. Further, the MCC had carried out the requisite correction in the application form of the Petitioner by reflecting that the Petitioner is a person with disability and belonged to the OBC category. 6. In the present case, the MCC has also carried out the requisite correction in the application form of the Petitioner by reflecting that the Petitioner is a Person with Disability upon the Petitioner having obtained the requisite eligibility certificate certifying that she belongs to the Person with Disability category. Page 3 of 5 SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 Mansi shelke
sr.903-wp-12843-2026.doc
7. Although, in that case, a statement had been made on behalf of the State CET Cell that, in the events seats are available from CAP Round 3 onwards, the State CET Cell has no objection to the Petitioner participating under OBC category in subsequent CAP Rounds, in the present case, such a statement is not made. However, we consider it appropriate to follow our
Order dated 23rd September, 2026.
8. We are of the view that, in the event the seats are available under the PWD category in subsequent CAP Rounds, viz., CAP Round 3 onwards, it would be unfairly prejudicial to the Petitioner, who has obtained the eligibility certificate and for whom the requisite correction has been carried out by MCC in the application form by reflecting that the Petitioner is a Person with Disability, to disentitle the Petitioner from participation under that category.
9. Accordingly, we allow the Petition by directing the Respondent No.3 State CET Cell to permit the Petitioner to participate in CAP Round 3 onwards under the PwD category as well as consider her eligible to participate in the under-graduate medical course for Academic Year 2026-27 from the PWD category.
SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 Mansi shelke
sr.903-wp-12843-2026.doc
10. It is made clear that this Order is passed in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case and shall not be treated as a precedent.
11. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms. There shall be no order as to costs.
[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [R. I. CHAGLA, J.] SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 Mansi shelke