Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12682 (GAU)

SRI JUGAL NAYAK v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/786/2026 · 2026-08-06

Michael Zothankhuma, Shamima Jahan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010159052026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/786/2026 SRI JUGAL NAYAK S/O LATE DULAL NAYAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KATHALTINGA, P.S. KAMARGAON, DISTRICT- GOLAGHAT, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K AZAD, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 SRI JUGAL NAYAK S/O LATE DULAL NAYAK RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KATHALTINGA P.S. KAMARGAON DISTRICT- GOLAGHAT ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 ------------ Advocate for : ABDUL KARIM AZAD Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 07-08-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Ms. S.K. Laskar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A.K. Azad, learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is a delay of 24 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Section 302 IPC. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 24 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant