Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010156562026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2721/2026 TULSI GOGOI SON OF SRI PHULESWAR GOGOI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MISSAMARI, P.O., P.S. AND MOUZA- HALEM, DISTRICT- BISWANATH, ASSAM VERSUS BHIM BAHADUR THAPA AND 3 ORS. SON OF LATE KHARGA BAHADUR THAPA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MISSAMARI, P.O., P.S. AND MOUZA- HALEM, DISTRICT- BISWANATH, ASSAM 2:NAR BAHADUR THAPA SON OF LATE KHARGA BAHADUR THAPA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MISSAMARI P.O. P.S. AND MOUZA- HALEM DISTRICT- BISWANATH ASSAM 3:TIL BAHADUR THAPA SON OF LATE KHARGA BAHADUR THAPA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MISSAMARI P.O. P.S. AND MOUZA- HALEM DISTRICT- BISWANATH ASSAM 4:SMTI TRITHA MAYA THAPA WIFE OF LATE KHARGA BAHADUR THAPA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MISSAMARI P.O. P.S. AND MOUZA- HALEM Page No.# 2/3 DISTRICT- BISWANATH ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A IKBAL, MS. J SARMA,G IMTIAZ,MR. S C BISWAS Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : SRI TULSI GOGOI SON OF SRI PHULESWAR GOGOIAGED ABOUT 66 YEARSRESIDENT OF VILLAGE MISSAMARIP.O. P.S. AND MOUZA HALEMDISTRICT BISWANATH ASSAM VERSUS SRI BHIM BAHADUR THAPA SON OF LATE KHARGA BAHADUR THAPARESIDENT OF VILLAGE MISSAMARIP.O. P.S. AND MOUZA HALEMDISTRICT BISWANATH ASSAM 2:SRI NAR BAHADUR THAPA SON OF LATE KHARGA BAHADUR THAPARESIDENT OF VILLAGE MISSAMARIP.O. P.S. AND MOUZA HALEMDISTRICT BISWANATH ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MS JAYALAKSHMI SARMA Advocate for : appearing for SRI BHIM BAHADUR THAPA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 12.08.2026 Heard Ms. S. Sanjita, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 36 days in preferring the connected RSA. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides. This Court is of the opinion that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. This court further opine that Page No.# 3/3 going for issuing notice to the respondent would not serve any purpose rather it will be sheer waste of time. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. Then present interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant