Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12680 (PAT)

Chandan Kumar v. The state of bihar

CR. MISC./20962/2026 · 2026-04-30

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20962 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Chandan Kumar S/O Nadul Prasad @ Nakul Prasad R/O Village- Panchi, P.S- Sheikhpura Sarai, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The state of bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 30-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sheikhpura Cyber P.S. Case No. 25 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 3(5) & 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(C) & 66(D) of the Information and Technology Act. 3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 02/03.08.2025, on receiving secret information, the Cyber Crime Police led a raid near Durga Temple, Panchi village, where several persons were found conspiring to commit cyber fraud and attempted to flee away on seeing the police. During the raid, six accused persons were apprehended and two mobile phones were Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20962 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 2/2 recovered from their possession. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5. Considering the serious allegation of cyber fraud levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. P. Kumar (Sandeep Kumar, J) U