Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12679 (ALL)

ANOKHELAL AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/11974/2025 · 2026-10-04

Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Rajeev Misra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11974 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. No one appears on behalf petitioners to press the present writ petition. Even though the name of Mr. Chandra Prakash Pandey is duly published in the cause list, however, neither he nor anyone on his behalf is present to press the present writ petition, even in revised call. 3. Learned AGA representing the State-respondents 1, 2, 3 is present. 4. Perused the record. 5. Petitioners Anokhe Lal and two others have approached this Court by means of present criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the impugned FIR dated 24.5.2025 lodged by first informant respondent 4 - Vimlesh and registered as Case Crime No. 0154 of 2025, under Section 323, 329(3) BNS and Section 2/3 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, Police Station - Allahganj, District - Shahjahanpur. 6. On the matter being taken up, the learned AGA representing State- respondents 1, 2, 3 submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer, upon completion of statutory investigation of aforementioned case crime number, in terms of Chapter XIII BNSS, has already forwarded the charge sheet/police report dated 4.4.2026 in terms of Section 193(3) BNSS. 7. In view of above, we are of the view that the jurisdictional magistrate must have taken cognizance upon aforementioned charge sheet/police report Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Anokhelal And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 210 BNSS. As such, we are of the considered opinion that present writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 8. It is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous. October 5, 2026 S.K.S. CRLP No. 11974 of 2025 2 (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad