HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40209 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Heard Sri Virendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dharmaveer Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has questioned the impugned notice no. 29 dated 12.6.2026 of the proposed action of the demolition exercise to be carried out despite the fact that peitioner has submitted the reply to the notice on 23.6.2026, however, no decision has been taken thereupon and now the respondents are trying to carry out demolition exercise. In the given facts and circumstances of the case, we are disposing of the petition with direction to the respondent no. 2 to dispose of the matter of notice dated 12.6.2026 within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this after giving due consideration to the reply of the petitioner and he may be given opportunity of hearing. Needless to add, the order to be passed by the respondent concern, shall be reasoned and speaking one. Until such decision or period of three months from today, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner pursuant to notice in question. With the aforesaid observations and direction, this petition stands disposed of. October 5, 2026 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Sharma, Rajneesh Sharma, Tarun Kumar Mishra, Virendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dharmaveer Singh (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Lallan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad