1 2026:CGHC:1844 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 287 of 2026 1 - Madho Singh Thakur S/o Mukta Singh Thakur Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Sarona, Ravidas Nagar, Ward No. 70, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) (Petitioner Was Retired On 30/06/2022 From The Post Of Sthal Sahayak) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Work Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Engineer In Chief Public Work Department, Nirman Bhawan, Sector 19 North Block, Nava Raipur, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chief Engineer Public Work Department, Raipur Circle, Civil Lines Near Akashwani, Raipur Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Superintendent Engineer Public Work Department, Mandal- 01 Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department, Division No. 02, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 6 - District Treasury Officer District Treasury Office, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Saksham Soni, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 2 13/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employee is entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioner. Identical issue came up for hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and are only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner, at this stage, he is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit fresh representation. In the event, petitioner submits representation, his claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed off with aforesaid observation and direction. C.C. as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.01.14 12:12:42 +0530