Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12652 (MAD)

D.Yamuna v. Sivanantham and another

CONT P/784/2026 · 2026-03-06

K Surender, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:994 CONT P No. 784 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER CONT P No. 784 of 2026 D.Yamuna ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Sivanantham The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District. 2. Saravanan The Thasildhar, Office of Thasildar, Bhavani, Erode District ..Contemnor(s) Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for Contempt of Court under Contempt of Court Act 1971 for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 06.06.2025 passed in W.P.No. 17322 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Contemnor(s): Mr D Ravichander Special Government Pleader For R1 And R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 784 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) In pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 06.06.2025 in WP.No.17322 of 2025, Revenue Tahsildar conducted survey. During the course of survey, authorities identified encroachments in ‘cart track’. Encroachers have instituted a suit in OS.No.59 of 2025 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Bhavani. The fact remains that complaint referred to District Level Monitoring Committee, who also conducted an enquiry and found that there is an encroachment on cart track and such encroachment is to be removed. 2. In view of an expressed bar for institution of suit under Section 14 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, Civil Court cannot grant any injunction in respect of the Government land. Thus, there is no impediment for the authorities to proceed with the enforcement action and remove the encroachments by maintaining public pathway free for usage to the general public. Since enforcement actions have already been commenced, authorities are directed to conclude the same as expeditiously as possible. 3. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 06-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 784 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. Sivanantham The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District. 2. Saravanan The Thasildhar, Office of Thasildar, Bhavani, Erode District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 784 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND K.SURENDER, J. GD CONT P No. 784 of 2026 06-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis